Financial site: Savings, Earnings & Business

Update 1 ny fed report aims to end money fund reform stalemate

full redemptions from customers at all times, researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York suggested on Monday, fleshing out one of the latest ideas that could break a stalemate over regulating the $2.5 trillion industry. Under the proposal, funds would make a small fraction of every investor's balance in a money fund subject to delayed withdrawal at all times in what the authors called a "minimum balance at risk," or MBR. The idea drew opposition from the fund industry's main trade group, however. U.S. regulators have been trying in vain to tighten rules affecting money fund investors in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, when dozens of funds ran into trouble and needed backing from their sponsors and the government. The industry maintains that more stringent fund investing rules added in 2010 are sufficient. The new plan published in a blog post by two Fed economists and two other Fed officials would motivate investors to look closely at a fund's riskiness before putting in money, the four wrote. That would be an advantage over proposals to restrict redemptions only when funds come under stress, the report added. The minimum balance could be five percent of an investor's highest balance over the previous thirty days, for example, they said. The MBR "would strengthen incentives for early market discipline," according to the proposal outlined on the New York Fed's Liberty Street Economics blog.

The authors include Marco Cipriani, senior financial economist at the New York Fed, plus two other officials at the bank and a senior economist for the Fed's Board of Governors. A similar idea was raised in an opinion piece by New York Fed President William Dudley in the middle of August, based on a prior research paper by the four. At the time, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Mary Schapiro was weighing whether to issue for comment several other possible regulatory solutions.

But a week later three of the SEC's five commissioners sided with the industry and stopped Schapiro from moving forward with the proposal. The proposal would have required money funds to either abandon the $1-per-share net asset value many investors prefer, or put in place capital buffers and redemption restrictions to cope with rapid withdrawals. That left the issue to the Financial Stability Oversight Council chaired by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. In a letter on Sept. 27 he urged the council to consider reforms, including the "minimum balance at risk" idea. In the blog post on Monday, the New York Fed group said a main advantage of their idea is that during times of stress, it gives investors an incentive to stay with a fund. Also, "retail investors, who traditionally have been less quick to run from distressed funds, would enjoy greater protection if they don't run" from a troubled fund, the Fed group wrote.

The minimum balance at risk idea would work well in tandem with a capital buffer for the funds, they added. Asked about the New York Fed proposal, a spokeswoman for the Investment Company Institute in Washington, the fund industry's main trade group, said in an e-mailed statement that it could make money funds less appealing. The minimum balance at risk concept "is essentially a redemption freeze that bars investors from accessing all of their cash when they want it. Surveys of money market fund investors have shown that the product would become unattractive to them if a daily redemption freeze were implemented," said spokeswoman Rachel McTague. That could dry up a major source of funding for businesses and public-sector debt issuers, she said. She added that the Fed did not address the operational complexities of the change. Also, she said: "A daily redemption concept is one that a majority of Commissioners at the SEC have opposed, so recycling an idea from July that's already met strong resistance doesn't seem to help the debate." var $relatedItems = $('lia "/article/usa-congress-tillerson-idUSL1N1EU1CC"U.S. Republicans positive on Tillerson, Democrats have questions/a/lilia "/article/volkswagen-emissions-detroit-idUSL5N1EU3Y3"Volkswagen CEO to stay away from Detroit auto show/a/li'), $relatedItems = $relatedItems.slice(0,10), relatedBlockLimit = Number('6'), relatedItemsTotal = $relatedItems.length, $paragraphTags = $('#article-text p'), contentParagraphs = 0, minParagraphs = Number("8"); for (i=0; i $paragraphTags.length; i++) { if ($paragraphTags[i].innerText.trim().length 0) { contentParagraphs = contentParagraphs + 1; } } if (contentParagraphs minParagraphs) { setTimeout(function(){ if (relatedItemsTotal relatedBlockLimit) { $('.first-article-divide').append('div class="related-content group-one"h3 class="related-content-title"Also In Regulatory News/h3ul/ul/div'); $('.second-article-divide').append($('.slider.slider-module')); $('.third-article-divide').append('div class="related-content group-two"h3 class="related-content-title"Also In Regulatory News/h3ul/ul/div'); var median = (relatedItemsTotal / 2); var $relatedContentGroupOne = $(' ul'); var $relatedContentGroupTwo = $(' ul'); $.each($relatedItems, function(k,v) { if (k + 1 = median) { $relatedContentGroupOne.append($relatedItems[k]); } else { $relatedContentGroupTwo.append($relatedItems[k]); } }); } else { $('.third-article-divide').append($('div class="related-content group-one"h3 class="related-content-title"Also In Regulatory News/h3ul/ul/div')); $('.related-content ul').append($relatedItems); } },500); } Next In Regulatory News Oil business seen in strong position as Trump tackles tax reform N. Y. pension fund manager pleads not guilty to pay-to-play scheme NEW YORK, Jan 4 A former portfolio manager at New York state's retirement fund pleaded not guilty on Wednesday to charges that he steered $2 billion in trades to two brokerages in exchange for bribes that included vacations, cocaine and prostitutes. UPDATE 1-Trump to nominate Wall Street lawyer Clayton to lead U.S. SEC WASHINGTON, Jan 4 President-elect Donald Trump said on Wednesday he intends to nominate Walter "Jay" Clayton, an attorney who advises clients on major Wall Street deals, to lead the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. MORE FROM REUTERS window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push({ mode: 'organic-thumbnails-a', container: 'taboola-recirc', placement: 'Below Article Thumbnails - Organic', target_type: 'mix' }); Sponsored Content @media(max-this site) { #mod-bizdev-dianomi{ height: 320px; } } From Around the Web Promoted by Taboola window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push( { mode: 'thumbnails-3X2', container: 'taboola-below-article-thumbnails', placement: 'Below Article Thumbnails', target_type: 'mix' } ); window._taboola = window._taboola || []; _taboola.push

Your money solve a buddhist riddle about managing your money

A Zen "koan" is a Buddhist riddle designed to get you thinking. So here is one: your money situation is not really about the numbers. That is what Bari Tessler wants you to ponder for a minute. The Boulder, Colorado-based financial therapist and author of the newly-released book "The Art of Money," who puts her master's degree in psychology to use by running a year-long "money school" for clients. She also knows that behind every budget or spreadsheet, there is layer upon layer of volatile factors, including emotions, family histories, habits and dreams. She sat down with Reuters to chat about how understanding your money can actually help you understand yourself. Q: This is a different kind of money book, talking about things like emotions and healing and spirituality. What made you want to write it?A: I think more and more people are looking for a more holistic and values-based relationship to money. I don't think that approach is weird or extreme - in fact, it is the missing ingredient for most people. Q: What is behind your argument that money issues are not really about the numbers?A: Knowing your numbers is part of it, but understanding money issues goes so far beyond that. For most of us, money is so emotional that we need to find the tools and practices to deal with those emotions - the anger, the sadness, the anxiety. Such a cocktail of emotions comes up that you have to understand your upbringing and your own money story.

Q: What is the "Body Check-In," and why is it such a big part of your advice?A: That is probably my favorite tool of all. A Body Check-In means taking some time whenever you face a money decision - maybe 30 seconds, maybe a few minutes - and just paying attention to what your body is telling you. I invite people to pause and notice what your feelings are, whether you are checking accounts online or having a money conversation with your partner. Q: What are the three stages you lay out to get on a better money track?

A: Money Healing, Money Practices and Money Maps - in that order. You need to start with the emotional and psychological work first. Then you can start getting into tracking systems and looking at your numbers. Finally you can look at stuff like future planning. Q: Why are Money Dates with your partner and with yourself so critical?A: Money is part of life and you have to give it attention. So take something like five minutes a day, or 30 minutes a week, and sit down and give your money issues some care and nurturing. I try to make those dates meaningful. I light candles, get out some dark chocolate or a glass of wine.

Q: Why do you suggest that people go through 'Money Cleanses' once in a while?A: People do body cleanses all the time. Once, someone asked me what would a money cleanse look like? It means removing things from your normal lifestyle for a while, which can be very helpful to your budget. For instance, sometimes when money is tight, my husband and I go into "Maximum Lockdown" mode to reduce our spending. It makes it kind of fun, and it does not have to be forever. Q: Why should people draft different sets of budget projections?A: Most bookkeeping systems have just one set of budget projections. That felt too tight and rigid for me. So I suggest people have three different budgets: one for covering basic needs, one for a more comfortable lifestyle and one for the ultimate lifestyle we all hope for. Pick one track to follow for six months or a year, and then tweak or fine tune along the way - because life happens. Q: Your book talks about leaving a money legacy for the past, present and future. What is yours?A: I had to untangle a lot of dynamics with my father, who was very tough on me, but also gave me a lot of gifts like entrepreneurship. My current legacy is teaching others about understanding themselves and their relationship with money, and my future legacy will involve the money lessons I am passing along to my eight-year-old son.